HERE is a link to purchase or preview the book.

I’ve worked on this book for a long time, and I’m particularly proud of it. One of the wonderful things about making a picture book is the ability to get a whole story out there with a manageable work load.

Some spreads:

-Tom

So I am running a bit late with getting my picture book on sale. I’ve printed two copies and I’m still adjusting a few things. So I’ll have it up for sale soon- hopefully within two weeks.

On the left is the cover design. Contrary to what you may think, the cover is probably a fairly good way to judge a picture book.

-Tom

Here are the 7 illustrations that are anticipated to be published in the 9th edition of “Asking the Right Questions” by M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keeley. (click any of the images to enlarge)

Correlation is not Causation-

Trying to “win”: the wrong attitude toward argument-

Dichotomous Thinking-

Two methods of Critical Thinking-

Multiplicity of Causes-

Socratic Teaching-

Flaws of Personal Observation-

-Tom

Pliability of Personal Observation:

[click to enlarge]

Correlation Fallacy:

[click to enlarge]

Multiplicity of causes:

[click to enlarge]

Socratic teaching and sponge teaching:

[click to enlarge]

Two ways of being a critical thinker:

-Tom

I don’t have much time to write, but I am working on illustrations for a book called “Asking the Right Questions”. (I’ve mentioned it before). It is a very exciting project, so I am thrilled to show the first finished panel.

Thoughts? Comments?

-Tom

In the coming semester I will be working on a series of illustrations/cartoons possibly appearing in the next version of a book called Asking the Right Questions. It is quite an interesting book- written by one of my professors: Dr. M. Neil Browne.

The following sketches are based on subject matter within the book.

1) Sponge Learning vs. Panning for Gold Learning

2) Teaching with Questions

3) Critical Thinking Etiquette

4) Attitude toward debate: Winning Vs. Furthering Understanding

5) Descriptive Arguments and Prescriptive Arguments

What are your impressions? Feel free to give me any feedback, ideas/changes etc…
-Tom